PFAS in Drinking Water by State
Data from the EPA's UCMR5 monitoring program. 1,687 of 3,490 tested water systems have at least one PFAS compound above the EPA's Maximum Contaminant Levels.
What this data shows
In 2023, the EPA finalized Maximum Contaminant Levels for five PFAS compounds: PFOA (4 ppt), PFOS (4 ppt), PFHxS (10 ppt), PFNA (10 ppt), and GenX/HFPO-DA (10 ppt). The data below comes from the EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR5), which required large water systems to test for PFAS between 2023 and 2025.
A system is counted as "over limit" if any of these five compounds exceeds its MCL. States are ranked by the total number of affected systems. Note that UCMR5 primarily tested larger systems (serving 3,300+ people), so smaller community systems may have undetected PFAS contamination.
PFAS rankings by state
| # | State | Tested | Over Limit | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | 236 | 165 |
70%
|
| 2 | Florida | 191 | 157 |
82%
|
| 3 | New Jersey | 174 | 156 |
90%
|
| 4 | Pennsylvania | 174 | 119 |
68%
|
| 5 | North Carolina | 145 | 115 |
79%
|
| 6 | Massachusetts | 143 | 106 |
74%
|
| 7 | Texas | 611 | 103 |
17%
|
| 8 | Alabama | 118 | 80 |
68%
|
| 9 | South Carolina | 90 | 68 |
76%
|
| 10 | Ohio | 141 | 59 |
42%
|
| 11 | New York | 98 | 52 |
53%
|
| 12 | Georgia | 77 | 42 |
55%
|
| 13 | Connecticut | 48 | 38 |
79%
|
| 14 | Tennessee | 87 | 37 |
43%
|
| 15 | Washington | 66 | 34 |
52%
|
| 16 | Kentucky | 87 | 32 |
37%
|
| 17 | Illinois | 123 | 27 |
22%
|
| 18 | Arizona | 57 | 25 |
44%
|
| 19 | Wisconsin | 51 | 23 |
45%
|
| 20 | West Virginia | 34 | 21 |
62%
|
| 21 | Virginia | 54 | 20 |
37%
|
| 22 | Indiana | 55 | 19 |
35%
|
| 23 | Minnesota | 87 | 17 |
20%
|
| 24 | Maryland | 30 | 16 |
53%
|
| 25 | New Hampshire | 18 | 16 |
89%
|
| 26 | Colorado | 39 | 14 |
36%
|
| 27 | Delaware | 17 | 14 |
82%
|
| 28 | Oklahoma | 61 | 13 |
21%
|
| 29 | Oregon | 18 | 11 |
61%
|
| 30 | Rhode Island | 15 | 10 |
67%
|
| 31 | Missouri | 71 | 9 |
13%
|
| 32 | Iowa | 32 | 8 |
25%
|
| 33 | Louisiana | 47 | 7 |
15%
|
| 34 | Michigan | 44 | 7 |
16%
|
| 35 | Mississippi | 9 | 7 |
78%
|
| 36 | Kansas | 34 | 5 |
15%
|
| 37 | Maine | 10 | 5 |
50%
|
| 38 | New Mexico | 10 | 5 |
50%
|
| 39 | Alaska | 9 | 4 |
44%
|
| 40 | Nebraska | 7 | 4 |
57%
|
| 41 | Utah | 16 | 4 |
25%
|
| 42 | Idaho | 8 | 3 |
38%
|
| 43 | Nevada | 10 | 3 |
30%
|
| 44 | Montana | 5 | 2 |
40%
|
| 45 | South Dakota | 7 | 2 |
29%
|
| 46 | Arkansas | 11 | 1 |
9%
|
| 47 | Vermont | 3 | 1 |
33%
|
| 48 | Wyoming | 3 | 1 |
33%
|
| 49 | Hawaii | 2 | 0 |
0%
|
| 50 | North Dakota | 7 | 0 |
0%
|
About the EPA's PFAS limits
PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are synthetic chemicals used in nonstick coatings, firefighting foam, and many industrial processes. They are often called "forever chemicals" because they do not break down in the environment. Long-term exposure has been linked to cancer, immune system effects, thyroid disruption, and developmental issues.
The EPA's 2023 MCLs are the first enforceable federal limits for PFAS in drinking water. Water systems have until 2029 to comply. In the meantime, the UCMR5 monitoring data provides the best available picture of which systems are affected.
If your water system has PFAS above the EPA limits, an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter certified for PFAS removal (NSF/ANSI 53 or 58) can reduce exposure. See our water filter guide for specific recommendations, or compare PFAS-specific filters.
Check your water for PFAS
Search your ZIP code to see PFAS test results for your water system, plus violations, lead data, and more.
Search your ZIP code